Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Need help with advocacy through legislation assignment | Economics Write
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

1250 words assignment, advocacy through legislation, follow a rubric and will be submitted
eafc9f7c_4ab7_4597_8e09_8fca3821411a.png

rubric_print_format_25.xlsx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code
NRS-440VN
Class Code
NRS-440VN-O503
Criteria
Content
Percentage
100.0%
Problem, Those Affected, Current Ramifications,
and Consequences if Problem Continues
15.0%
Idea for Addressing Solution
10.0%
Research Supporting Solution for Problem
15.0%
Stakeholder Support
10.0%
Stakeholder Opposition
10.0%
Financial Incentives and Costs
10.0%
Legislature Process and Information for Proposal 10.0%
Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy
10.0%
Research
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, and language use)
2.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
3.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Advocacy Through Legislation
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A description of the problem, those affected, current
ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is
omitted.
Idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best
course for advocacy is omitted.
Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for
addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other
states, are omitted.
Stakeholders in support the proposed idea are omitted.
Stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are omitted.
The financial impact for the issue and idea is omitted.
Legislative information needed and process to advocate for
proposal are omitted.
A discussion of how Christian principles supporting unbiased
advocacy for health care legislation is omitted.
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is employed.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
155.0
Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)
A partial or vague discussion of the problem, those affected,
current ramifications, and consequences if the issue
continues is presented. Why the problem would be best
addressed through legislation is unclear.
Idea for addressing the issue is vague. Why legislation is the
best course for advocacy is unclear. There are major
omissions.
Some support for the idea and its effectiveness in addressing
the problem is presented. Findings presented are not
substantiated, or do not provide evidence-based support for
the idea.
At least one stakeholder in support of the proposed idea is
presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete.
At least one stakeholder in support of the proposed idea is
presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete.At
least one stakeholder in opposition to the proposed idea is
presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete.
The financial impact for the issue and idea is only partially
presented. The assignment criteria are largely incomplete.
Legislative information needed and process to advocate for
proposal are largely incomplete.
A discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased
advocacy for health care legislation is incomplete. It is unclear
how the principles support positive patient outcomes and
inclusiveness for all populations.
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Limited research is apparent.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
A summary of the problem, those affected, current
ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is
presented. There are some omissions and inaccuracies.
Rationale is needed.
Idea for addressing the issue is generally outlined. Why
legislation is the best course for advocacy is summarized.
There are some minor omissions. Rationale is needed.
Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for
addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other
states, are generally presented. More information is needed.
There are some inaccuracies.
Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for
addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other
states, are generally presented. More information is needed.
There are some inaccuracies.General stakeholders in support
of the proposed idea are presented. It is unclear why they are
in support of the idea. More information is needed.
General stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are
presented. Explanation for why they are opposed to the idea
and strategies for debating or conversing with opposing
stakeholders is vague.
The financial impact for the issue and idea is outlined. More
information or support is needed for claims.
Legislative information needed and process to advocate for
proposal are generally outlined.There are some inaccuracies
or omissions.
A summary of how Christian principles support unbiased
advocacy for health care legislation is presented. Some
rationale or information is needed to demonstrate how the
principles support positive patient outcomes and
inclusiveness for all populations.
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance,
quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (89.00%)
A discussion of the problem, those affected, current
ramifications, and consequences if the issue continues is
presented. Some rationale is needed.
Idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is
the best course for advocacy is generally explained. Some
rationale is needed.
Idea for addressing the issue is outlined. Why legislation is
the best course for advocacy is generally explained. Some
rationale is needed. Substantive evidence-based findings
that support the idea for addressing the problem, including
similar legislation in other states, are presented. There are
minor inaccuracies. Some detail is needed.
Key stakeholders in support of the proposed idea are
presented. It is generally clear why they are in support of the
idea. Some detail or rationale is needed.
Key stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea are
presented. A general explanation for why they are opposed
to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing with
opposing stakeholders is presented.
The financial impact for the issue and idea is summarized.
Support for claims is generally supported.
The financial impact for the issue and idea is summarized.
Support for claims is generally supported.Legislative
information needed and process to advocate for proposal are
presented. Information or detail is needed in some areas for
accuracy or clarity.
A discussion of how Christian principles support unbiased
advocacy for health care legislation is presented. The
discussion generally demonstrates how the principles support
positive patient outcomes and inclusiveness for all
populations. Some detail or information is needed for clarity.
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the
issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
A well-develop discussion of the problem, those affected,
current ramifications, and consequences if the issue
continues is presented. Strong and compelling rationale is
provided. Insight into the problem and consequences is
demonstrated.
A logical and well-developed idea for addressing the issue is
outlined. Why legislation is the best course for advocacy is
thoroughly explained. Strong and compelling rationale is
provided.
Substantive evidence-based findings that support the idea for
addressing the problem, including similar legislation in other
states, are presented and demonstrate strong and compiling
support for the idea.
All significant stakeholders in support of the proposed idea
are presented and a well-supported explanation of why they
are in support of the idea are provided.
All significant stakeholders in opposition to the proposed idea
are presented. A well-supported explanation for why they are
opposed to the idea and strategies for debating or conversing
with opposing stakeholders is presented.
The financial impact for the issue and idea is clearly
summarized. Strong rationale and support for claims is
provided.
Comments
Legislative information needed and process to advocate for
proposal are clearly and logically presented. The legislative
process is clearly understood and insight into legislative
advocacy is demonstrated.
A well-developed discussion of how Christian principles
support unbiased advocacy for health care legislation is
presented. The discussion demonstrates an ability to act
impartially and in the interest of promoting inclusive patient
care without regard to gender, sexual orientation, culture,
race, religion, or belief.
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources
are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the
assignment criteria.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written,
academic English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

error: Content is protected !!